And the economic improvement continues

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,729
Tokens
Employment Rose Sharply in October as Jobless Rate Fell
By DAVID LEONHARDT

Published: November 7, 2003



ARTICLE TOOLS


E-Mail This Article
Printer-Friendly Format
Most E-Mailed Articles
Reprints & Permissions








RELATED


Text: October Employment Report (bls.gov)





TIMES NEWS TRACKER



Topics
Alerts

Economic Conditions and Trends




Unemployment




Labor Department








he longest hiring slump in more than 60 years might finally be over.

Employment grew by 126,000 jobs in October, the best showing in nine months, the Labor Department reported today, and job growth in August and September was significantly stronger than the government had initially estimated. It was the first time since late 2000 that the economy added workers for three straight months.

The unemployment rate fell slightly in October, to 6 percent, from 6.1 percent the month before.

"This is as dramatic a turnaround as you could hope for," said Ian C. Shepherdson, the chief domestic economist at High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, N.Y.

Restaurants, real-estate companies, doctor's offices and most of the rest of the broad service sector added to their payrolls last month, apparently in response to the recent jump in household spending, economists said.

Manufacturers, still struggling against foreign competition, cut jobs for the 39th consecutive month, but the loss was the smallest since the early months of the streak.

The number of people working part-time because they could not find full-time work fell 139,000, to 4.8 million. Average hourly wages rose by just a single cent, but an increase in hours as businesses worked harder to keep up with rising demand fattened weekly paychecks.

The recent job gains remain modest by many measures. They are not large enough to keep up with the growth of the labor force, suggesting that last month's decline in the jobless rate might have been a statistical blip.

"This is at most the beginning of the end, not the end itself," Drew Matus, an economist at Lehman Brothers, wrote in a note to clients this morning. The labor market recovery "is still in its early stages and still somewhat fragile."

But the increases also represent clear progress after two and a half years of layoffs and weak hiring that sliced the nation's payrolls by more than 2.5 million jobs, the biggest decline since the early 1980's.

The report offered more good economic news for President Bush, who has credited the three tax cuts passed since 2001 with softening the economic slump and predicted that they would eventually lead to job growth.

"We're delighted," said N. Gregory Mankiw, the chairman of the White House's Council of Economic Advisers. "I think we'll see robust job growth going forward."

The employment gain complicates the task of the Democratic presidential candidates, who have the made the severe job losses a centerpiece of their campaigns. Representative Pete Stark of California, the ranking Democrat on Congress's Joint Economic Committee, noted that the current pace of job growth would need to continue for 19 months to return to the peak employment level reached in early 2001.

If the job gains continue, they will also increase the odds that the Federal Reserve will raise its benchmark short-term interest rate during the first half of next year. Since June, the Fed has kept the federal funds rate on overnight loans at its lowest level since 1958 in an effort to shock the economy out of its sluggishness.

Low interest rates have led to a surge in mortgage refinancing, giving many families more cash to spend, and also decreased the cost of many car loans, small business loans and other types of loans.

Stocks rose modestly after the release of today's employment report. By mid-morning, the Standard & Poor 500-stock index was up about two-tenths of 1 percent. Bond prices, meanwhile, were lower. The Treasury's benchmark 10-year note was down about half a point, while its yield rose to 4.47 percent, from 4.41 percent late Thursday.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
This is very disturbing news.....for the democrats.

Like I repeated to the doom and gloom leftist about 5 times,jobs lag in a recovering economy.I also had to explain that the children would not starve if the taxes were cut,but would put money back in consumers hands....do you think the libs will ever get a clue?Or will they stick with their usual dillusional and very mis guided agenda?

[This message was edited by Patriot on November 07, 2003 at 11:37 AM.]
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
This is not distrurbing news for democrats. What is disturbing is that it took GWB 3 years to finally string a few months of decent economics together. What is disturbing is that our deficit is equivlent to 70K per US resident (I think that's the figure), and that while this administration passes it off as "not that bad", our children will eventually have to pay for this little elf's ludicris spending.

For now, at least some jobs are back. Hopefully, this idiot has things on the right track for the next 13 months until a qualified leader can step in.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
1,146
Tokens
Lander, that is an uncharacteristically weak effort by you at spinning the positive economic news.

Are you getting discouraged??

Buck up buddy, you can still hope for some horrible disaster to occur in the next eleven months.
icon_smile.gif


"Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man." - The Dude, 1998
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
This just tops it all off. Politics has gotten so phuckin partisan that you have half the politicians and their "core" supporters wishing for a bad economy! And I don't kid myself or anyone else, if a Democrat was in office the Republicans would be wishing for a bad economy too. Just when did we stop being Americans and start being a donkey or an elephant????? This crap has to stop, we ALL need jobs and we all need a better economy, this isn't a who is in office issue, this is an economic issue and we all should be working together on it. Even if there are election overtones to it, for once it would be nice if both sides of the aisle came together and said we will put aside or differences and do things for the American people, not just something selfishly for our party or our own selves. Then again I just can't see this happening anymore, partisan politics has just gone way too far to accomodate it.
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
Ok guys,
What exactly is your basis for saying all the Dems are hoping for a bad ecomony?

I'd like to see the evidence behind these claims. I won't hold my breath, I'm sure you'll be back with some spin-off.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Lander.

You're obviously a communist.

Anyone thats gives a rats ass about people is a communist dog, like you.

We'll get you son. You pinko homo atheist.

The national socialist republican freedom peoples party.
(freedom for everyone. As long as they do exactly as they are told)
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
335
Tokens
Everyone should obviously be hoping for an economic improvement, but I think from having read what many ecomists say, that it is too early to tell whether recent figures indicate the beginning of a turnaround or not. The consensus seems to be that the magnitude of the tax cuts and spending increases by the Bush government couldn't help but provide a temporary stimulus to the economy. The question is whether that stimulus will trigger further improvement. Let's hope so, but I'm scared of the deficits this government is running and I wish that Bush had chosen to hold off on tax cuts and instead focused on running balanced budgets and reducing the country's debt load. This seems to make sense to me just from a common sense point of view . . .
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Angus from Cambridge,one sure way of reducing the debt.......STOP SPENDING!!!
 

There's always next year, like in 75, 90-93, 99 &
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
15,270
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Patriot:
Angus from Cambridge,one sure way of reducing the debt.......STOP SPENDING!!!<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Amen. Let's start with the #1 expense - military.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
8,781
Tokens
Military expense isn't terribly high as a % of GDP and it drives a ton of high paying jobs in technology. Not to mention it provides large amounts and numbers of scholarships to people who would have no access to college or might not have access to anything but dead end jobs. I don't think we need to spend any more on military, but I wouldn't call for cutting it either. What is costly is forays into foreign engagements.

As for the economic recovery, there is almost no way it isn't going to hold now. It won't be 7% every quarter for sure, but I think 3.5-4.5% growth over the next 6-8 quarters should be the rule. Amazing thing is how Democrats want to call this a terrible economy, yet incomes are still growing above inflation and unemployment rate is very modest for a downturn. Sure there are caveats such as people giving up on trying to find work, but when household wealth is going up and people that have jobs are bringing home more real wages, that isn't a terrible economy. The biggest enemy to the middle and lower classes is bad inflation and there is no inflation right now, so the country is doing well for being in a downturn. As things pick up as long as inflation doesn't get ugly, the country will do extremely well and in 2005 I wouldn't be surprised to see us below 5% unemployment again, below the number that economists would say is the normal rate of unemployment.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
The economy being bad is another liberal myth,the economy goes in cycles,has since the begining of times....I remember CBS showing homeles people on the streets every other commercial during the Regan years...Clinton gets elected and in the first week its no longer a problem no more commercials.Perception and reality are 2 different things.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
335
Tokens
Patriot,
I don't think that the economy being bad is just a liberal myth. Of course many media people have either a conservative or liberal political bias, but surely Bush enacting huge tax cuts and spending increases in an effort to "bring back our prosperity" is at least a tacit admission on the part of conservatives that the economy is not so good. I do share your distaste for blatantly partisan and unfair reporting by media on both sides of the political spectrum though . . . .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,167
Messages
13,564,827
Members
100,753
Latest member
aw8vietnam
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com